As big law firms kiss President Donald Trump’s ring, Susman Godfrey is fighting back.
On Friday, the firm—which won a successful $787 million lawsuit against Fox News over the network’s airing of 2020 election conspiracies—filed a suit against a Trump executive order meant to “exact revenge.”
Paradigm PressJim Rickards: New Economic Boom Starting In May (act Fast)
“No administration should be allowed to punish lawyers for simply doing their jobs, protecting Americans and their constitutional right to the legal process,” Susman Godfrey said in a statement.
The firm’s complaint said that Trump’s order made “no secret of its unconstitutional retaliatory and discriminatory intent to punish Susman Godfrey for its work defending the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.”
On Wednesday, Trump signed an executive order barring Susman Godfrey from federal contracts held by the firm’s clients, removed its employees’ security clearances, and banned them from accessing federal buildings.
“But this goes far beyond law firms and lawyers,” Susman Godfrey said. “Today it is our firm under attack, but tomorrow it could be any of us. As officers of the court, we are duty-bound to take on this fight against the illegal executive order.” Since returning to office, Trump has been on a vindictive crusade against law firms that have challenged him or his administration in any shape or form by threatening them with executive orders.
Four firms, including the two largest firms in the country, Kirkland & Ellis and Latham & Watkins, cut a deal with Trump Friday, agreeing to conduct a total of at least $500 million in pro bono work for the administration.
The firms also pledged to scrap their diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and recruit job candidates regardless of political beliefs, including those “who have served in the Trump Administration.” Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft signed a similar deal Friday.
The president’s revenge spree has forced law firms to choose between succumbing to his demands or taking a stand and striking back.
Susman Godfrey joined the handful of firms that have taken action against the president, which includes Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block, and WilmerHale, calling the president’s spree of executive orders “so obviously unconstitutional.”
Perkins Coie—which Trump targeted for providing legal support to the Democratic National Committee (DNC)—was the first to fight back against the administration, claiming that the executive order against it was unconstitutional and full of “retaliatory animus.”
Its actions received wide support across the law community, with 500 firms signing an April 4 court brief filed on its behalf, The New York Times reported.